1. Why is USAMC Redstone recording historical information on Militec products, when its role is to catalogue products for Army? This same inaccurate information has already been generated numerous times by others within the AMC organization outside Redstone.This draft memorandum in effect questions the propriety of MILITEC-1's being made available to the Army. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, as well as memoranda from the Secretary of Defense, direct the services to take advantage of commercially proven, off-the-shelf items. MILITEC-1 directly fits that definition. It has an unblemished record of extensive commercial acceptance, and broad use by federal and state government agencies. In nine years of thorough use, both government and commercial, in weapons, industrial equipment, and vehicles, there has never been a complaint registered with Militec for damage or non-performance attributed to MILITEC-1. On the contrary, government and commercial users alike enthusiastically endorse the product.
2. From where did Redstone receive the information in this draft memo, and why has Redstone staff recorded it in a memo without verifying it for accuracy?
3. Is it Redstone's charter to advise AMC activities about congressional investigations and DLA requirements for establishing NSNs?
| Home | Site Use Agreement | Contact Us | Store |
©1988-2008 - MILITEC, INC.